Note to self: Dont blog while tilting.
Alright so now I’ve cooled down and can actually make a decent entry. The last two days I played a bunch of tournaments. I played the $8r with Zang for the first time which was fun and eventually cashed but didn’t do much else. I played the Daily Fifty Grand and bubbled it. I played couple other $55s, couple $3 rebuys, and some $20-30s. Out of all of them I only cashed in the $8r.
I feel like I’ve wasted my luck. Thats not something that many people recognize and I was one of them till recently. I’ve noticed that I’ve been running well but my results have been aweful and this goes back to before my win. Yes, I won 5 grand and that could easily blind me from the fact I should have won more if I just played well when running well. Its easy to say that I’m losing so I must be running bad but thats definitely not the case. I dont know what the exact numbers are because I stopped keeping records of all my tournaments back in July which I’m not sure if I mentioned. If I didn’t, I stopped keeping track because I felt like I wasn’t getting any use out of them. Sure I could go back and tell you what tournaments I played on which days and how I did but I wasn’t learning anything from them and I felt like it was a waste of time.
Ok so I feel like I havn’t played my best in every tournament but I’ve been running well. What does this all mean? Well I think it was Bkice who had posted about how if you dont play your best or close to it in every tournament you play then the tournaments that you dont, you dont know what could have been (or something to that effect). I started thinking about it and it makes so much sense. Whos to say that in even just one of these tournaments had I played my best that I wouldn’t have gone on to win it?
Another thing thats really holding me back and right now is the reason I could never do this as a job is tilt. Whether its tilting while playing or tilting after a bust, I tilt way too much. A couple weeks ago I had it well under control. I could bust from 5 tournaments at once to bad beats and wouldn’t look the other way but now its like if I get repopped I start tilting. I have no idea why. I relate tilting to smoking. I think people who refuse to try to and control their actions smoke and the same goes with tilting. I’m not sure what I can do other than try harder to not tilt but I will try.
Speaking of “doing this as a job” some would say that I already do but I dont see it as a job. I play when I want, I dont have rent to pay, I dont have major bills to pay, and if I dont play for 3 weeks, its not gonna kill me. I guess with the time I put in and the money I make it could be considered a job but I dont see it that way and I’m not sure if I ever will.
One last thing I wanted to talk about was math in poker. I read an article on p5s basically saying Dutch Boyd was right in getting his money in bad 3 times against Hachem in that heads up match at the series because of the probability that he’d win 1 of them. While I understand that the math works, I dont agree with the concept. First off, Dutch doesn’t know what position hes in when hes sticking his money in. As far as he knows Hachem could have AA all three times and then the math doesn’t work. But thats beside the point, the point is that I can’t wrap my mind around purposely sticking your money in bad because “you’ll win one of them”. With all the top players going into great detail about math in certain shove/push situations or whatever I began to wonder if thats all online poker is……math. And it may be that but thats why its not real poker. Real poker is live poker. I saw the movie “Rounders” on Wednesday for the first time and watched it another 5 times as I type this on Friday morning. The movie really drove that point home. It reminds me how in real poker all these math wizards dont do nearly as well as the natural born poker players. Let me ask you this, would you rather be able to read people and know what they have or be able to figure out what the probabilty of their range is? I love the part where Mike is talking to the Dean about how his cards wouldn’t even matter in the lawyer/judges game. How he could play it blind and cut it up. It just reminds me of my own home game and my thoughts on playing the person and not the cards. Great movie.
Dont get me wrong I know theres the optimal game theory for poker tournaments and -EV plays in the long run and I know some people go by that and its great for them but it’ll never be me. Will I eventually secum to that and play online poker based on all that math, maybe but thats why live will always be real poker. People who have a deep understanding for the math in poker are usually pretty successful and someone like David Skalanksy has been making the majority of his living off gambling some being poker for years now. But I’ll take Daniel Negreanu over David Skalanksy in any game anyday. Skalansky will put Negreanu on a type of range of hands he has and knows the optimal play according to math while Negreanu knows what David is holding and can exploit it to the maximum.
My plans for the next couple days are up in the air. I wanna review some more hhs and make sure when I set out to put in a full day of playing, I dont play bad and tilt because I’m realizing that I’ll never achieve success at these limits if I continue doing those things.
Peace
Double